TC-321-325, R-Tech Capital Highstreet, Phool Bagh, Bhiwadi, Alwar (RJ.)- 301019

+91 7427-061557

Apply for Trademark Reg.

Trademark Objection Response Service:

● Fast Turnaround: Document drafting by senior IP lawyers within 24 hours.

● Quick Upload: Documents uploaded within 2 working days.

● Refund Guarantee: Full refund if the documents are not uploaded within the given time frame.

This service ensures a speedy and professional response to trademark objections in India.

Trademarks are essential assets for businesses, but obtaining registration can be difficult due to potential conflicts with already registered marks. Here’s an overview of the trademark objection process in India:

● Examination Process: Upon filing a trademark application, the examiner reviews it against the database of registered trademarks to identify any identical or confusingly similar marks.

● Issuance of Examination Report: If concerns arise, the examiner issues a report outlining objections, such as similarities to existing trademarks, descriptiveness, or other issues.

● Purpose of Objections: The objection process aims to protect consumers from confusion and ensure that the proposed trademark doesn’t infringe upon existing rights. This helps maintain a fair marketplace and prevents brand dilution.

● Responding to Objections: Applicants must respond to the objections raised by the examiner, usually within a set time frame (e.g., 30 days), by providing clarifications or arguments to overcome the objections.

A trademark objection in India occurs when the Trademark Registry raises concerns about a trademark application, preventing its registration. This happens when the mark is too similar to an existing trademark or violates absolute grounds for refusal, such as being descriptive, deceptive, or immoral.

After an objection, the applicant has a limited time (usually 4 months) to respond by either defending the mark, making amendments, or abandoning the application. The registry will then review the response and decide whether to accept the application or issue further objections.

The objective is to ensure trademarks are distinctive, do not cause consumer confusion, and comply with legal standards.

The Process Following an Objection:

● Examination Report: If an issue is identified, the examiner issues an Examination Report outlining the reasons for objection.

● Applicant’s Response: The applicant typically has:

● 4 months for standard applications.

● 3 months for fast-track applications.

To respond by filing a reply that may include:

● Defending the mark’s distinctiveness with evidence or arguments.

● Amending the application to resolve issues (e.g., changing elements to avoid confusion).

● Abandoning the application if further prosecution is unlikely to succeed.

● Registry Review: After the response, the Trademark Registry evaluates the reply and can either:

Accept the application.

Issue further objections.

Schedule a hearing to resolve the matter.

A Trademark Examination Report is issued by the trademark office after reviewing an application to assess its eligibility for registration. It outlines any objections or issues that could prevent the trademark from being granted. Here’s what it typically includes:

● Applicant Details: Name and contact information of the applicant.

● Trademark Details: The mark being applied for, including any design or word elements.

● Goods/Services: A description of the products or services the trademark is associated with.

● Trademark Search Results: A search of existing trademarks to identify any conflicting marks.

● Objections: If there are any, such as similarity to existing marks or issues with distinctiveness, descriptiveness, or compliance with legal standards.

● Applicant’s Response: The applicant’s reply to the objections (if any).
Trademark Office’s Decision: The final outcome, either approval for registration or rejection.

In India, a trademark application can be objected to by the Registrar of Trademarks for several reasons. Here are some of the key reasons why objections may be raised:

● Similarity to Existing Marks:
If the proposed trademark is identical or confusingly similar to an existing registered trademark or a pending application, it can cause confusion among consumers, leading to an objection.

● Descriptive or Generic Terms:
Trademarks that merely describe the goods or services they represent, or use common, generic terms, are often rejected because they lack the distinctiveness necessary for registration.

● Offensive or Immoral Content:
Trademarks containing offensive, immoral, or scandalous words or imagery can be objected to under public morality and public order provisions.

● Deceptive Marks:
Trademarks that could deceive the public regarding the nature, quality, or origin of the goods or services (e.g., misleading names or logos) may be refused registration.

● False Geographical Indications:
If a trademark falsely implies a particular geographical origin for the goods or services (e.g., calling a product “Swiss” that is not from Switzerland), the application may be objected to.

● Similarity to Well-Known Trademarks:
Trademarks that are identical or similar to a well-known trademark may be objected to, even if they are not in the same class, to protect the reputation of the well-known mark.

● Non-Distinctive Designs:
Trademarks consisting of common shapes, colors, or symbols that are not distinctive may be rejected, as they fail to distinguish the applicant’s goods or services.

● Improper Use of National Symbols:
The use of national symbols, flags, or emblems (e.g., the Indian flag) in a trademark without authorization from the relevant authorities can lead to objections.

● Errors in Application:
Technical errors, missing documents, or incomplete information in the trademark application (e.g., incorrect descriptions of goods/services) can trigger objections.

● Inadequate Specification of Goods/Services:
If the goods or services linked to the trademark are not clearly or specifically described in the application, it may lead to objections due to ambiguity or lack of clarity.

Trademark Examination Report: Issued by the Trademark Office detailing the objections raised.

● Response to Examination Report: A formal reply addressing each objection, which may include amendments or evidence of distinctiveness.

● Proof of Use (if applicable): Evidence showing how the trademark has been used in commerce (e.g., ads, sales data).

● Authorized Document for Representation: A power of attorney if an attorney or agent is representing the applicant.

● Identification Documentation: Proof of the applicant’s legal status, such as a government-issued ID or business registration details.

● Address Verification: If relevant, proof of the applicant’s business address or legal standing.

● Additional Supporting Documents: Additional evidence may be needed depending on the nature of the objection (e.g., market surveys, media coverage).

These documents are necessary to effectively respond to a trademark objection and move forward with the registration process.

Monitor Trademark Application Status: Regularly check the status of your application with the Trademark Registry to understand if any objections have been raised.

● Review the Trademark Objection: Thoroughly read the Examination Report issued by the Trademark Office. The report outlines the reasons for the objection, which may include similarities with existing trademarks, lack of distinctiveness, or other legal grounds.

● File the Trademark Objection Reply: Prepare and file a formal reply to the objection within the stipulated time (usually 4 months for standard applications). The reply should address each objection with supporting evidence or arguments.

● Review and Double-Check the Response: Before submitting, ensure your response addresses all points raised in the objection. It’s important to provide adequate evidence and avoid errors to improve the chances of a positive outcome.

● Obtain Commentary or Expert Review: You may seek feedback from legal experts or attorneys specializing in intellectual property to ensure your response is legally sound and comprehensive.

● Outcome of Reply: If the Trademark Office is satisfied with your reply, the trademark will be published in the Trademark Journal, which is a significant step toward registration.

● Appear for the Hearing (if required): If objections are not resolved through the written response, a hearing may be scheduled. As the applicant, you are required to attend the hearing or appoint a representative to argue your case before the Registrar.

When you receive a trademark objection notice, it is essential to respond promptly and in accordance with the legal process to ensure that your trademark application proceeds smoothly. Here’s a step-by-step guide to filing a trademark objection reply:

● Review the Trademark Objection Notice: As soon as you receive the Trademark Objection Notice, read it thoroughly to understand the grounds of objection. This could relate to issues such as similarity to existing marks, descriptiveness, or other legal grounds for refusal.

● File the Counter Statement: The first step in responding to the objection is to file a counter-statement. This must be done within two months of receiving the objection notice. The counter-statement addresses the specific objections raised and provides a legal defense.

● Prepare and Submit Supporting Documents: Substantiate your response by providing supporting documents and evidence to reinforce your case. This could include:

Proof of use of the trademark

Evidence of distinctiveness or brand recognition

Relevant legal arguments or case law to support your position.

● Appeal to the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB): If the Registrar rules in favor of the opposing party despite your objections, you can appeal to the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB). The appeal must be filed within three months from the date of the Registrar’s order.

● Delays and Fine: If there are delays in filing the counter-statement or appeal, you will need to explain the reason for the delay and pay a fine of ₹2,500. If the reason for the delay is accepted, the IPAB will set a date for the hearing.

● Verify and Endorse the Application: All documents submitted during the trademark objection reply process must be verified and endorsed by the Deputy Registrar. If any defects are found in the application, the Deputy Registrar will issue a notice requiring corrections to be made.

● Submit Corrections Within Two Months: If a notice of defects is issued, you must make the necessary changes and submit them within two months. If you fail to do so, your application may be abandoned.

● IPAB Decision: After reviewing all the provided documents, the IPAB will issue a decision on the trademark objection case. If the decision is in your favor, the trademark may proceed to registration.

Ordinary Applications:

Reply must be filed within 4 months from receiving the Examination Report.

You can request a 30-day extension before the deadline expires.

● Fast-Track Applications:

Reply must be filed within 3 months.

Extension of up to 30 days is also possible with the prescribed fee.

● Consequences of Missing the Deadline:

● Abandonment: Failing to reply on time results in abandonment of the application, losing the priority date.

● Lost Opportunity: You cannot address objections, delaying or preventing registration.

It’s important to file the response promptly to ensure your application proceeds smoothly.

A trademark objection in India can occur for several reasons based on the following criteria:

● Similarity: If the trademark is too similar or identical to an existing trademark, especially within the same class of goods or services, it can lead to an objection.

● Confusion: If the use of the trademark could cause confusion among consumers or lead to mistaken identity with an already registered trademark, an objection may be raised.

● Descriptiveness: Trademarks that merely describe the goods or services (e.g., generic or commonly used terms) are not eligible for registration.

● Offensive: If the trademark contains offensive, derogatory, or scandalous content that could harm public morality or hurt a community, it can be objected to.

● Deceptive: If the trademark misleads or deceives the public regarding the quality, origin, or nature of the goods or services, it may be objected to by the Registrar.

Understanding these eligibility criteria is essential to avoid the risk of objections and to ensure that your trademark is distinctive and protects your brand effectively.

If a reply to a trademark examination report is not filed within the prescribed timeframe, the following consequences can occur:

● Abandonment of the Application: The trademark application will be considered abandoned, and no further action will be taken on it.

● Loss of Registration Opportunity: Without responding to the objections, you lose the chance to have the trademark registered.

● No Exclusive Use: You cannot use the trademark as a registered mark, which means you will not have exclusive rights over it.

● Inability to Prevent Infringement: You won’t be able to stop others from using or registering a similar trademark, leading to potential conflicts or infringements.

While you can file a new application for the same trademark, you will need to address the earlier objections raised in the examination report to avoid repeating the same issues.

If a reply to a trademark examination report is not filed within the prescribed timeframe, the following consequences can occur:

● Abandonment of the Application: The trademark application will be considered abandoned, and no further action will be taken on it.

● Loss of Registration Opportunity: Without responding to the objections, you lose the chance to have the trademark registered.

● No Exclusive Use: You cannot use the trademark as a registered mark, which means you will not have exclusive rights over it.

● Inability to Prevent Infringement: You won’t be able to stop others from using or registering a similar trademark, leading to potential conflicts or infringements.

While you can file a new application for the same trademark, you will need to address the earlier objections raised in the examination report to avoid repeating the same issues.

After filing a trademark objection reply, here’s what you should do next:

● Wait for the Trademark Office’s Decision: The trademark office will review your objection reply and make a decision. This review process can take several months, depending on the complexity of the objection and the office’s workload.

● Consult with an Attorney: If you’re unsure about the trademark office’s decision or the next steps, it’s advisable to consult with an experienced trademark attorney. They can help you understand the decision, guide you through any further actions, and provide professional advice on your options.

● File an Appeal (If Needed): If your trademark is still refused after the objection reply, you have the option to file an appeal with the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB). This appeal must be filed within a specified time frame, usually 3 months from the date of the rejection.

● File a New Trademark Application: If your application is ultimately rejected and you believe the trademark is still valid, you can file a new trademark application. However, you must ensure that the issues raised in the original examination report are addressed in the new application to increase your chances of approval.

Expert Team: GTS has a skilled team of trademark attorneys to handle the objection process efficiently.

● Simplified Process: We make the trademark objection reply process quick and hassle-free with expert support.

● Timely Completion: Our in-house team ensures all formalities are completed without delay.

● Personalized Guidance: We provide dedicated assistance at every step to address any objections.

● Proven Track Record: Trusted by thousands of businesses for trademark protection.

Contact GTS to get your trademark objection process handled professionally and swiftly.

A trademark objection occurs when the examiner finds issues with a trademark application, such as similarity to existing marks, descriptiveness, or other legal concerns. The applicant is notified and must respond within 30 days. If no reply is made, the application may be abandoned.

You can access the Trademark Objection report through the Indian Patent Office (IPO), which provides the examination report detailing any objections raised regarding your trademark application.

Trademark experts typically draft and file a response to a trademark objection within three days of receiving the objection notice.

To clear a trademark objection, the applicant must provide evidence demonstrating the mark’s acquired distinctiveness through its prior use in the market. This can include showing how the trademark has gained recognition among consumers, which may involve submitting sales data, advertising materials, or other proof of the mark’s established presence and reputation.

To find out if your trademark has been objected to in India, you can check the status of your application on the official website of the Trademarks Registry. If an objection has been raised, the Registrar will issue an official examination report outlining the details of the objections and the reasons for them. You can access this report through the Trademarks Registry’s online portal or receive it directly via email or post.

Trademark objections are typically raised during the examination stage of the trademark registration process. After you file your trademark application, the Registrar of Trademarks reviews it to ensure compliance with legal requirements. If any issues are identified, such as similarity to existing trademarks or descriptive nature, an objection is raised. The examiner issues an Examination Report outlining the objections, and the applicant is given the opportunity to respond within the specified time frame.

Section 9(1)(a) Trademark Objection in India refers to objections based on absolute grounds for refusal. A trademark can be objected under this section if:

Descriptive: The mark is too descriptive of the goods or services it represents.

Generic: The mark is a common term or name used for a type of product or service.

Lacks Distinctiveness: The mark does not distinguish the applicant’s goods or services from others.

Section 9(1)(b) Trademark Objection arises when a trademark is found to be too similar to an existing registered trademark or a pending application, potentially causing confusion among consumers. This objection ensures that trademarks are distinct and do not mislead the public. The applicant may need to modify the trademark or provide evidence to overcome the objection.

Get Started with Global Consultants

Ready to register ? Submit your details below, and our experts will guide you through the process..

Contact Us for more details and to get started with your process!